The
New York Times has an interesting article this morning about Democratic candidate for Governor Creigh Deeds and his recent
poor performance in the polls. It seems that some Democrats are wondering whether Terry McAuliffe would have been a better nominee for the party. Adam Nagourney describes in the article some of the perceived advantages of having McAuliffe as the nominee. What do you think, did the Democrats choose a weak nominee?
No comments:
Post a Comment